Mr. Speaker, H.R. 368, the Removal Clarification Act of 2011, will enable Federal officials to remove cases to Federal court in accordance with the spirit and intent of the Federal officer removal statute, 28 U.S.C. 1442(a). This is a noncontroversial, bipartisan bill. In the 111th Congress, a nearly identical version passed the House under a suspension of the rules and passed the Senate with an amendment by unanimous consent. Under the Federal officer removal statute, a Federal officer should be able to remove a case from State court to Federal court when it involves the Federal officer's exercise of his or her official responsibilities. The purpose underlying the Federal officer removal statute is to prevent State litigants from interfering with the Federal Government's operations. There is, however, some ambiguity as to whether the Federal officer removal statute applies to State pre-suit discovery procedures. More than 40 States have such procedures, which require individuals to be deposed or respond to discovery requests even when a civil action has not yet been filed.
Editor's note · Context
The speaker discusses the Removal Clarification Act of 2011 and its implications for federal officer removal to federal court.
Share
More from Hank Johnson
I yield myself such time as I may consume. Madam Speaker, I rise in strong support of H.R. 8666, which would amend title 28 of the United States Code to authorize holding court in the Central Division of Utah in Moab and Monticello. Adding…
H.R. 7039, the Stronger Communities Through Better Transit Act, introduced by Congressman Hank Johnson (GA-04) would help federal transit policy take a serious step in the right direction.
The Stronger Communities through Better Transit Act establishes a grant program in line with your priorities to support operating projects for public transportation.
The VA needs improvement, but reckless cuts are not the answer. Veterans should not bear the brunt of mismanagement.





