Mr. Chairman, my amendment would strike title II of H.R. 1155, which would require agencies to undertake a regulatory CutGo process to repeal rules identified by the commission with little to no consideration of the rules' benefits prior to issuing the new rule. These regulatory CutGo provisions would apply to every new agency rule, no matter how important or pressing, for every regulatory agency. Alarmingly, title II would also require agencies to undertake a notice and comment process for all rules eliminated through CutGo because, as I noted earlier, agencies are unable to simply rescind the rules. Thus, this bill would substantially delay or even prevent new regulations through this burdensome and time-consuming requirement. As several of my colleagues' amendments demonstrate, the bill's regulatory CutGo procedures are unsafe, dangerous, and would tie the hands of agencies responding to public health crises requiring timely regulatory responses. In fact, this bill lacks any mechanism for consideration of public policy and safety, which would leave no option for agencies to issue emergency rules to protect the public and environment from imminent harm. The bill's proponents claim that title I of H.R. 1155 would allow the commission to consider whether the costs of the bill are not justified by the benefit to society.…
On the recordJanuary 6, 2016
Share & report
More from Hank Johnson
Jul 25, 2023
Experts agree that dangerous speech from elected officials creates a climate that foments violence and threatens public safety.
Jul 19, 2023
Mr. Chairman, long-term weather patterns affect turbulence, and that is what we need to study. We should not deny that there will be long-term effects of climate change. We should not ignore the fact that climate change is real and is…
Feb 13, 2024
We need to ensure that judges and court personnel are kept safe, and your officers are crucial in that effort.
Jan 16, 2024
Mr. Speaker, I yield myself the balance of my time to close. Mr. Speaker, I note that the PRESS Act is endorsed by a number of First Amendment and press freedom organizations, including the ACLU, the Center for Democracy and Technology…





