In fact, where he lives in Mount Dora which is in my district many, many of the Democrats who live in Mount Dora happen to be African-Americans. So by saying that he will not treat somebody who supported Obama, he's saying that he's not…

What he is doing is no different from saying I will not treat a black person, I will not treat a Catholic.

It is a clear violation of ethics, and it's a particularly ugly one. Why is it that the right wing is so preoccupied with denying people health? Why is that?

The question is, is what he did legal?

What he's doing is no different from saying, 'I will not treat a black person. I will not treat a Catholic.'

How do we get to a point where a good bank has a bad asset?

So why is it that we do something like enable banks to absorb losses from bad assets in this program?

wouldn't we be better off if we gave the same amount of money to good banks, banks that were functioning well?

Seriously, wouldn't it have been better to extend that kind of credit to Americans rather than New Zealanders?

Well, the Constitution says, 'No money shall be drawn from the Treasury but in consequence of appropriations made by law.'

Is it safe to say that nobody in 1913 contemplated that your small little group of people would decide to hand out half a trillion dollars to foreigners?