The answer is oil. If you take a look, 2002 to 2008, where did the subsidies go? Well, the oil industry got over $70 billion of taxpayer money in direct tax subsidies, $72 billion. The green renewable energy got $12.2 billion over that same period of time, 2002 to 2008. And in addition to that, the ethanol industry got $16.8 billion. So we really, if we took this money, this subsidy, $70 billion over a 6-year period and shifted it over to this side, particularly up here to the renewable energy--this is solar, wind, advanced biofuels like algae and the rest--where would we be? Where would that young lady's future be? Renewable energy of all kinds. You shift the subsidies around. Is that possible? Can we do that? What do you think?
Editor's note · Context
Garamendi discusses the disparity in subsidies between the oil industry and renewable energy.
Share
More from John Garamendi
Bloated defense spending has been a serious problem for far too long. Requiring unfunded priorities only encourages the Pentagon to seek additional funding outside the normal budget process, often at the expense of readiness and sound…
"Despite these successes, they cannot overcome the fundamental flaws in this legislation. The bill that passed is a loss for the country."
This bill, like nearly all of the Trump and Republican agenda, does nothing to make Americans’ financial situation better.
The bill that passed is a loss for the country, and one whose consequences our children will feel for years to come unless Democrats regain control of Congress.





