Political Quotes

John Garamendi: Well, now that's an interesting question. Clearly, we have institutions that are too big to fail. That's where the TARP…

On the recordMay 5, 2010
Well, now that's an interesting question. Clearly, we have institutions that are too big to fail. That's where the TARP legislation that was the last act--one of the last acts of the Bush administration--came into being. The Treasury Secretary, Mr. Paulson, who actually was the CEO of Goldman Sachs, as I recall, came to this House, came to the Senate, and said, Oh, my. Oh my. The world is going to collapse unless you immediately cough up a trillion dollars to the banks to stabilize the banks. Fortunately, this House said, Wait a minute. Let's see what we're doing here. Instead of a 1-page bill giving the Treasury Department a trillion dollars, the TARP program was put in place. And it did stabilize the financial institutions but it was a clear sign that Wall Street banks had become too big. AIG. How much have they taken? Twenty-three billion dollars of our money. Are we going to get it back? We don't know.
Said by
John Garamendi
Democratic · California
Source
govinfo.gov
May 5, 2010

Editor's note · Context

Garamendi discusses the implications of the TARP legislation and the issue of institutions deemed too big to fail.

Share

More from John Garamendi

Jun 15, 2026

I cannot, in good faith, approve a budget that rewards this behavior and fails to rein in an out-of-control President."

garamendi.house.gov
Jun 11, 2026

The administration’s reliance on the Defense Production Act (DPA)—no doubt in consultation and coordination with lawyers representing Sable—is a serious misuse of a federal law meant to be invoked for national security reasons, not to…

garamendi.house.gov
Jun 20, 2026

Simply put, there is no way that a Golden Dome system that costs $185 billion could possibly live up to the promise of 'forever ending the missile threat to the American homeland.'

garamendi.house.gov
Jun 7, 2026

$1.5 trillion, or $1,500,000,000,000. That is the egregious and dangerously irresponsible amount of money the Trump Administration has requested for military spending.

garamendi.house.gov

Other voices in this conversation