Well, what happened in proposition 103--and I was the newly elected Insurance Commissioner in 1991 responsible for implementing the law. The insurance industry had the ability to work together to set rates and to monopolize the market in a way that was in a pattern to be able to have a uniform rate system using what was called rating bureaus. We simply outlawed rating bureaus and forced each company to use its own statistical analysis to set rates. The result was, over a 10-year period, a $30 billion reduction in costs to homeowners and automobile insurance consumers in the State of California. {time} 2300 I will tell you this, when you force these companies to compete, when you eliminate their protection from the antitrust laws, you will see a significant rate decrease. And when you have a company such as Blue Cross, that dominates a segment of the market, that is what is outlawed under the normal antitrust laws of this Nation.
Share & report
More from John Garamendi
Mr. Speaker, sometimes it is a mistake to listen to each other, and perhaps that is where we are right now. I am hearing Mr. Larsen present the legislation, which actually would repeal the Make It In America provisions into the future. I…
How many minutes do I have remaining, sir? The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman would have to be recognized as the designee of the chair or ranking minority member of the Committee on Appropriations to be allowed to offer a pro forma amendment…
Mr. Chair, I demand a recorded vote. The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from California will be postponed. Amendment No. 38 Offered by Ms. Hageman The Acting…
Mr. Chairman, I posed a question to the Chair. Does the Chair have an answer to my question? Is fairness out of order on this floor? The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman has not stated a parliamentary inquiry. The gentleman will state his…





