Well, what happened in proposition 103--and I was the newly elected Insurance Commissioner in 1991 responsible for implementing the law. The insurance industry had the ability to work together to set rates and to monopolize the market in a way that was in a pattern to be able to have a uniform rate system using what was called rating bureaus. We simply outlawed rating bureaus and forced each company to use its own statistical analysis to set rates. The result was, over a 10-year period, a $30 billion reduction in costs to homeowners and automobile insurance consumers in the State of California. I will tell you this, when you force these companies to compete, when you eliminate their protection from the antitrust laws, you will see a significant rate decrease. And when you have a company such as Blue Cross, that dominates a segment of the market, that is what is outlawed under the normal antitrust laws of this Nation.
John Garamendi: “Well, what happened in proposition 103--and I was the newly elected Insurance Commissioner in 1991 responsible for…”
Editor's note · Context
Garamendi discusses the impact of Proposition 103 on insurance rates in California.
Share
More from John Garamendi
We write to request that you immediately authorize the release of $32.2 million from the Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC) to address the time-sensitive threat posed to the wine, winegrape, and table grape industries from Glassy-Winged…
I cannot, in good faith, approve a budget that rewards this behavior and fails to rein in an out-of-control President.
I had the chance to meet with each of these students, and I’m pleased to announce that our country’s future is in good hands with these bright and capable future service members.
The administration’s reliance on the Defense Production Act (DPA)—no doubt in consultation and coordination with lawyers representing Sable—is a serious misuse of a federal law meant to be invoked for national security reasons, not to…





