There is widespread bipartisan agreement that the 1099 reporting rules need revision. In fact, the agreement is so widespread that I'm mystified why we're having this debate. The Senate passed a repeal of this policy earlier this year on a bipartisan basis. The House, last year, failed to pass a repeal of the provision only because of Republican opposition. But now we all agree, let's repeal it. What's the hang-up? The hang-up is the Republicans want to pay for this business tax cut on the backs of lower- and middle-income families. This bill would increase taxes by $25 billion in total on families earning less than $110,000. Families with incomes around $90,000 per year could see increases in taxes of $3,000, according to the Joint Committee on Taxation. This is a remarkable piece of legislation because it unwinds a near- unanimous agreement that we had last year. This policy wouldn't just increase taxes. It would discourage enrollment in health plans in health exchanges. Under the Republican proposal, people who are eligible for tax credits would have to think very hard as to whether they were estimating their income accurately. They are estimating this income in the beginning of the year, but later in the year, they may get a raise, they may get a promotion. They may even get a job. And then they could be hit with a huge repayment penalty for a simple mistake: a promotion or a new job.…
Share & report
More from Henry Waxman
This morning, our Nation's leading climate scientists released the country's third National Climate Assessment. The report confirms that climate change is real, is being caused by humans, and is already harming communities across America…
On rollcall No. 460, had I been present, I would have voted ``yes.'' Amendment No. 3 Offered by Mr. Holt The Acting CHAIR. The unfinished business is the request for a recorded vote on amendment No. 3 printed in House Report 113-563…
You don't think the bill is needed. Does that mean you are against domestic prosperity and global freedom? Mr. McNERNEY. No, I don't think that is what it means, Mr. Chairman.
This bill provides, if it is a cross boundary with Canada or Mexico, you cannot have a NEPA review, an environmental review, except right around there, right around where the boundary is. Now, if you built a pipeline in the United States…





