Well, if I could say to my friend, through the Chair, fine, get me the code. But the Senator said his amendment specifically excluded it, and it does not. I am researching now that part, but there is no question there is no explicit prohibition here. So now you get into a circumstance where you have one Federal law that says one thing, another Federal law that says something else, and we know where that leads, folks. That leads to court. I think my friend wanted to exclude being able to carry weapons near levees and dams and so on. He ought to like the status quo because that is the status quo. The status quo is, if you want to use a gun for hunting, fishing, recreation, fine, the corps already allows it. You just cannot use it on critical infrastructure. He says that is his point. What is the problem? What is the problem? As I discuss this with my friend, I do not see why his amendment is necessary. I hope he will withdraw it, frankly. The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Oklahoma.
Share & report
More from Barbara Boxer
Mr. President, I am in full agreement with the remarks of my chairman, Senator Inhofe. Once again, I think we have proven we can get this done. We can get infrastructure done. I think the way the agreement came together with the two…
Madam President, this is a moment for me that, I think it is fair to say, I will never ever forget. I am so honored. I am so honored to have members of my family here, staff from past and present from both my personal office and committee…
Reserving the right to object, I am not going to object, but you said 80 minutes. Who has the other--the reason I am asking is, I didn't know if I needed to yield time to the other side, which I prefer not to since you have your own time…
As the ranking member of the Environment and Public Works Committee, I agree with the explanation provided by Senator Inhofe.





