Viable companies don't slash and burn the rights of the secured bond holders knowing that the issuance of new corporate bonds is bound to be a key in their future survival.

Viable companies aren't made by delivering ownership of them to the union whose unrelenting contract demands and unbending work rules drove them headlong down to the road to bankruptcy in the first place.

Mr. Bloom, it is my view that what the President and the auto task force sought was not viable companies but pliable companies.

Did you not see that the lawlessness of what the task force was doing as it put together deals would be shredding the Bankruptcy Code?

I think you are going to see a huge change in the market share between Ford if the Obama administration and the UAW don't conspire to wipe them out as well.

some of us, myself included, voted against the bailout early on because we could kind of sense from history that whenever government gets a hold of things and comes in and tries to run things that the disaster that follows is predictable

This is the Administration that lawlessly gives imaginary constitutional rights to foreigners who seek to attack Americans, this is the Administration that lawlessly deprives American citizens and investors of their contractual rights…

Viable companies don't eagerly sign up for CAFE standards that can only force them to make small cars Americans don't want for the nonexistent profits that don't follow.

This Administration has made many risky decisions related to terrorism.

even the most sage and wise among conservatives can become a little disoriented now and then.

he seemed to have a difficult time articulating what a terrorist really is, and that concerns me, since he is the lead law enforcement official in the country, charged with protecting us from terrorists