Mr. Chair, this amendment is, frankly, completely unnecessary. It would require preparation and submission of an annual report in perpetuity regarding the migrants housed on certain public lands. Yet, the underlying bill would essentially ban any such housing. It is a permanent requirement for reporting on nothing, paid for by the taxpayer. Over the years, I have heard plenty of skepticism from my Republican colleagues about some of the reports that Congress requires of the executive branch. Usually, though, I can at least see the argument for those other reports, but I have to say it is interesting to see my Republican colleagues in favor of this one. That said, I don't think this amendment is worth fighting over either. Having these reports would not be useful, but it would not be actively harmful either. I only hope that House Republicans would change their minds about slashing the budgets of these departments and will instead give Federal workers the funding they need to carry out their missions, which will now also include generating these annual reports. Mr. Chair, I reserve the balance of my time.
Share & report
More from Raúl Grijalva
Mr. Speaker, I yield myself the balance of my time to close. Let me just comment on all the commentary from the sponsors of the legislation, Mr. Westerman, and our other colleagues, who outlined the importance of the legislation and the…
Based on the OIG's findings in its September 2023 report on the National Park Service's (NPS) deferred maintenance management, please explain the primary reasons that NPS deferred maintenance costs have increased since Fiscal Year 2021.
Mr. Speaker, I yield such time as he may consume to the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Veasey), the co-lead of the legislation.
Mr. Speaker, I yield such time as he may consume to the gentleman from Colorado (Mr. Neguse), the sponsor of this bipartisan legislation.





