In closing, the underlying legislation, H.R. 2117, stacks the deck against due process and the ability for families and students to seek redress when institutions or programs deny them or mistreat them regarding the services that they've purchased and the education that they're seeking. By reinserting that provision, we allow families and students to have redress, to have due process and to have a fair and balanced look at complaints they might have. It is simple, it is direct, and it merits remaining in the legislation. With that, I yield back the balance of my time.
On the recordFebruary 28, 2012
Share & report
More from Raúl Grijalva
Nov 30, 2023
Mr. Speaker, I demand a recorded vote. A recorded vote was ordered. The SPEAKER pro tempore. This is a 5-minute vote. The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--ayes 224, noes 203, answered ``present'' 1, not voting 7, as…
Jan 30, 2024
This bill is not just a give-away to the mining industry. It is a wholesale giveaway of our public lands.
Jan 9, 2024
Based on the OIG's findings in its September 2023 report on the National Park Service's (NPS) deferred maintenance management, please explain the primary reasons that NPS deferred maintenance costs have increased since Fiscal Year 2021.
Jan 10, 2024
the U.S. Government spends $649 billion per year on fossil fuel subsidies, according to the International Monetary Fund.





