Defensive systems would inhibit and make uncertain the threat of a first strike against the United States of America.
I believe that a substantive assessment of the New START treaty demonstrates that the treaty is in the U.S. national int...
I don't understand why we go to the trouble of negotiating with a potential adversary with the understanding that the ad...
I view missile defense as a way of inhibiting a first-strike motivation by the part of the Russians or anybody else.
Last year, the Perry-Schlesinger Strategic Posture Commission alerted Congress to the dire need for modernizing the nucl...
a failure to ratify would carry substantial costs for the United States.
Missile defense doesn't harm anybody's deterrence, it harms the ability of countries for first strike.
there are compelling reasons for the Senate to give its consent to ratification of the New START treaty.
Mr. D'Agostino, is the fiscal year 2011 and the future years budget plan sufficient to support the fiscal year 2017 deli...
What would the consequences of denying such a request have on meeting the critical 2017 deadline?
Do you believe that local government should be compensated for lost tax revenue and reimbursed for additional expenditur...