Do you want aeronautics and space money, NASA money, going to aeronautics and space or are you comfortable with the diversion of about $2 billion a year to global warming, climate change initiatives?
Mo Brooks
The Public Record
NASA since its inception has had responsibility for exploring the universe and helping us understand it better.
When it comes to human spaceflight, we are no longer the preeminent country in space.
During my time I would like to emphasize the very broad nature and scope of the war resolution that we are being asked to support.
So we are going to wait until they kill a bunch of people before we attack them. Is that what you are saying the administration's position is?
Unfortunately, the EPA analysis relies on a flawed methodology for estimating the extent of newly jurisdictional waters that systematically underestimates the impact of the definitional changes.
EPA is proposing an expansion of the definition of the term Waters of the United States to include categories of waters that were previously never regulated as Waters of the United States such as all waters in floodplains, riparian areas…
The inclusion of these waters will broaden the scope of the Clean Water Act and will increase the cost associated with each program.
I take a moment to respond to the rather partisan mischaracterization and distortion of my remarks by Congressman Connolly of Virginia.





