So, in fact, the Department has yet to comply with Benghazi's ARB recommendation 11. Correct?

Is there a timetable, Mr. Starr, in place for assigning the MSG detachments to the, you say four posts?

Do you think that is sufficient?

I think that I have never seen security taken as seriously as it has been in the last 2 years.

How can we have the confidence that that will be fully implemented?

So we still have, according to Mr. Starr's testimony, we have four places, very dangerous places of the world where American lives are at stake because we don't have the proper security in place?

When I talked to you last time, 3 months ago, it doesn't seem like we have made much progress...

Did any of the security companies that had contracts fully perform all vetting required in their contracts?

Not a great practice.

So, to get to the point, even if a post is not high-risk, high-threat, we know in certain parts of the world things are very volatile and can unravel in a moment's time.

And was Benghazi considered high-risk, high-threat or a critical threat?