With a presumption that it would go into civilian court. That was the policy that the committee you put together recommended--unwisely, I think.
I believe that was a failure of duty to defend the lawfully passed statutes of the United States.
I believe that it's beyond unrealistic. It really could be dangerous if it clouds our thinking.
The goal should be, am I not correct, to ensure the defense and security of the United States of America?
Every President since Truman has advocated that as a goal.
I will just say if the President had said to the U.S. Senate, the New START treaty is a start toward disarmament, I gues...
I do feel like that President Bush, George W. Bush, our recent President Bush, unilaterally drew down nuclear weapons su...
Isn't it true that other nations depend on the U.S. nuclear umbrella, that there is a political, psychological dimension...
As we deal with the proper level of nuclear weapons, don't we need to consider also what may be in China's plans for the...
I would refrain from speaking for our allies, but I suspect it would not make some of them feel any better at all.
These are important issues. I don't pretend to know the answers.