On the public record
Every politician on the site, every statement on file. Search, filter, and read the public record.
11,000+·quotes on file
In light of the current expectation that almost every eligible professional and hospital will need to upgrade in order to comply with Stage 2 requirements, is the vendor community adequately resourced to meet this unprecedented demand for…
I have heard from many providers and vendors, both large and small, about some of the challenges in becoming 'meaningful users'.
I think we are all better informed of the complexity of the issues involved.
Accurate and efficient matching of individual patients to their health records across settings is a wonderful thing if we can do it right.
I am hopeful that leaders at ONC and CMS are paying attention to our hearing this morning.
The Agency should base its work on sound science rather than regulatory ambition.
I am concerned that the EPA has failed to include a risk assessment as part of this study.
I would love to explore that question of the impacts.
This seems especially important in light of the landmark study released this week by DOE's National Energy Technology Laboratory showing no evidence that fracking chemicals impacted drinking water in western Pennsylvania.
The Agency's figures and characterizations were misleading, lacked relevant context, and were designed to produce self-fulfilling results.
It bothers me that the Office of General Counsel refuses to meet with us.
Unfortunately, despite promises made to the members of this panel, EPA's lawyers have prevented the supposedly independent panel of experts from responding directly to these questions.
SABs were created to provide scientific advice to this Committee.
EPA's recent announcement that it is walking away from its attempt to link hydraulic fracturing to groundwater issues in Wyoming is the most recent example of the Agency employing what I consider a 'shoot first, ask questions later' policy…
Whereas, with Rule of Reason analysis they could continue to take into account the presumption of patent validity and that would operate unhindered in that context.
By the way, when we're in the context of a patent, isn't there something sort of internally inconsistent or contradictory about a standard that would require the patent holder in this context to produce clear and convincing evidence to…
In your testimony you note that we have a statutory directive that exists under current law that all patents are to be presumed valid.
We don't want anti-competitive behavior in our marketplace.