I would rather put it my way and say, would you recommend a 20 percent cut?

Thank you very much, Mr. Grumbles. I appreciate your illuminating comment.

So, again being very specific, would improving our wastewater treatment infrastructure, might it substantially reduce the concentration of contaminants?

So is it appropriate to say that there is no cause for concern about human health, even though EPA itself said that it could cause cancer in animals?

But for now, there is not enough work to be done that a 20 percent cut would not impair?

If you only had two words you could issue, yes or no, which one would you pick, Mr. Grumbles?

It is somewhere between unlikely and zero? Because it is obviously a matter of growing concern.

But putting that aside, you know, accepting that as a condition of existence, Dr. Snyder you are referred to, what do you think about that?

You say it gets your attention. Well, OK.

Our air travel system is still overburdened.

It's clear Congress needs to act.

Somebody has to fix the mess that America's travelers are left in.

The bill Senator Lott and I wrote, the 'Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2007,' was unanimously reported out by this Committee.

Our Amtrak bill will make passenger rail a real option for travelers.

Airlines need to take a step backward from scheduling practices that are disconnected from reality, in that some schedules aren't worth the electrons they're printed on.

There's no such thing as an unsafe staffing level, because FAA will slow traffic and put more space between the planes if staffing got too low.

The average price for a gallon of gas is $2.85, which forces workers to choose between filling their tanks and paying their bills.

Those cars and trucks will cough pollutants into the air that will create smog, give people asthma attacks and contribute to global warming.