There is a disproportionate number of women receiving Social Security benefits who live in poverty.

I think that is enough bouquets.

I believe there is room for modernizing Social Security to better address modern family situations, though any such effort must acknowledge that Social Security's promises, as currently structured, are unsustainable.

That would clearly mean significant increases in taxes on lower-wage earners as well as the middle class.

I want to thank you again for holding today's very important hearing.

If we are going to get anything done, it will require that the President engage.

I am particularly concerned that the bill might unsettle some legitimate contractual expectations the sports leagues have bargained for.

I am certainly open to examining in the future whether the antitrust exemptions enjoyed by professional sports leagues in their current forms rest on sound justifications.

No one really likes sports blackouts, least of all the public.

I take a keen interest in ensuring that our competition laws are functioning well and having their desired effect of protecting competition.

Those antitrust laws are an important and effective tool for ensuring free markets and protecting low consumer prices.

So you say he didn't change the law, but the President says he changed the law.

The first 2 years of the Obama administration the Democrats had the House, the Senate, and the Presidency, and they did nothing on immigration.

The country made a change. We actually passed an immigration bill. It was my bill.

I am getting tired of the Democrats with this righteous indignation saying that we can't find a Congress we can work with.

The EEOC received a charge on October 16, 2014, and filed suit on October 27, 2014, alleging that an employer's wellness plan violated the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act, or GINA.

Employers are very concerned that lawsuits are moving forward on wellness plans before EEOC issued any guidelines.

As this involves a novel area of the law and contradicts how other cabinet level agencies interpret wellness plans under the Affordable Care Act, why was this litigation not submitted to the commissioners for review prior to the filing?