Both Presidents of these HBCUs, Shaw and St. Aug's, said that they simply do not have some of the infrastructure and the equipment to do that kind of research.

So, to the extent we are intensifying demands on those resources, we are worsening that strain.

So, if we are sending $4 billion to try to change what hasn't been done by these nations abroad, do you believe this $4 billion could be useful in the United States to try to ameliorate the problems here?

Isn't it important that American policies be decidedly organized to deter, you know, not to enable that practice?

Those folks just build higher walls and hire more private security to protect them from their own population.

We learned that everyday Americans have a newfound interest in the markets, and that is positive.

60 percent of maternal deaths are preventable.

The actions taken by the administration in the first days of office have helped accelerate the crisis we are seeing today.

I do not fault those who seek a better life for their families, but the current administration's rhetoric and policies also encourage thousands of migrants to put themselves... in danger.

I believe that the current crisis has been unnecessarily caused or accelerated by misguided policies.

It is ridiculous that our securities laws force most everyday Americans to the sidelines of early-growth investment opportunities.

Like so many other bad progressive ideas sold under the guise of investor protection, Democrats' proposals will ultimately reduce access to investment opportunities.

I represent the 2d District in North Carolina, which is the Research Triangle area, and we are a very STEM-focused area.

This crisis demands urgent attention and serious action to save the lives of Black mothers.

It just seems to me more plausible that governments are formed, societies that become successful, do so by their own internal decisions.

Let's stand up for equity--true equity--and that is ownership of the American economy.

We should not punish everyday American investors with a Democrat agenda, a progressive agenda that results in fewer investment options.

I do have a bipartisan bill, H.R. 1350, Senate colleague Senator Brown and Toomey and my House colleague, Bob Latta.