Mr. President, today I rise to recognize the 50th anniversary of the Mexican Fiesta in Milwaukee. I am proud to honor this tradition that showcases the rich cultural history of the Hispanic community in Wisconsin. What began as a small…

Mr. President, today I rise to honor posthumously half- brothers Captain Robert C. Harmon and Private John R. Peirson from New Richmond, WI, who both made the ultimate sacrifice for our great Nation during World War II. A week before the…

I hope this isn't a case of another cabinet secretary who, at a minimum, is misleading, perhaps lying to the American people.

The request for $80 million to add to the IRS, this is a perfect reason why we ought to do it.

Mr. Speaker, this week the House will consider the Military Construction, Veterans Affairs, and Related Agencies appropriations bill. As a former Navy SEAL and combat veteran, I am proud to support this legislation. It delivers on our…

When you spend this much money in the middle of a pandemic and you must push the money out very fast, the fraudsters just show up.

Mr. Speaker, we have a few issues that ought to be debated on the floor and brought to the attention of the news media to help them with articles that would educate the American public a little bit on issues of importance. I haven't spoken…

This is no longer a republican issue, and I'm almost surprised in many ways that republicans pitch permitting reform, as it should be coming from the other side.

Don't expect the federal government to come in and you know, bail you out.

This is an apolitical science based issue, and we are using the process as a rhetorical tool to stop the projects that you don't like.

It seems to me that the overall question we ought to be asking is with limited resources, and we have limited resources, what's the best way to spend them?

This is an apolitical science based issue, and we are using the process as a rhetorical tool to stop the projects that you don't like.

If it's going to be spent to mitigate climate change, I would argue it's probably going to be misspent because I don't think there's anything we can really do to hold back the tides.

Don't expect the federal government to come in and you know, bail you out.

If it's going to be spent to mitigate climate change, I would argue it's probably going to be misspent because I don't think there's anything we can really do to hold back the tides.

This is no longer a republican issue, and I'm almost surprised in many ways that republicans pitch permitting reform, as it should be coming from the other side.

So that is a huge vulnerability, I guess what I'm arguing with limited resources, I would much rather see us spend $60 to $90 billion to purchase those now, put those in place offline in case you have one of those high catastrophic events…

It seems to me that the overall question we ought to be asking is with limited resources, and we have limited resources, what's the best way to spend them?