We are providing some intelligence. We're not providing the kind of real-time targeting because that, you know, steps over the line that makes us participate in the war.

I think the Chairman would agree with this assessment--that we do not have a moment to lose here in space.

I'm glad to do that. Here's what I'm interested in. I'm just asking whether the government believes that the FBI's operational use of these tools would be legal and whether that's still on the table.

I believe that we have a very strong moral obligation to welcome those Afghans who have risked their lives.

Russia doesn't want a direct conflict with the United States.

The international community's sanctions and economic work with respect to Russia have resulted in quite impressive outcomes.

The world should live in peace, the world should live in a pluralistic way, by which he meant with freedom of speech, freedom of religion, self-determination--and that's what's at stake here.

We've seen it in freefall. I believe it's lost about 40 percent of its value.

While Putin was lying to us and to the Ukrainians and his own people, your people were ascertaining the truth, and we were warning the world.

There's widespread speculation that, in exchange for a new nuclear agreement with Iran, that the Administration is considering lifting sanctions on Iranian organizations or individuals.

Isn't Putin's monopoly on providing energy to Europe a boot on the neck of the Europeans?

the Intelligence Community has assessed the transfer of MiG-29s to Ukraine may be mistaken as escalatory and could result in significant Russian reaction that might increase the prospects of a military escalation with NATO.

We're all part of the same thing called NATO, and under that agreement, when one of NATO's member's geography is challenged, the rest respond.

It's my view that he uses negotiations as just another tool on his toolbox.

Is there any evidence that the Central Bank of Iran has stopped financing terrorist activity?