we need a national uniform certification program

Thank you, Mr. Chairman, for your kindness.

I know firsthand the significance of the many programs and various matters that fall within your jurisdiction.

I want to discuss with you today one of those various matters that is of great importance and concern not only to me personally, but I believe to our Nation as a whole.

How do we not end up with antiquated technology, and so forth?

I particularly appreciate the fact that in a role with Iraq that it was very important to honor the bravery, the sacrifices of our troops over many years.

I believe that the U.S. use of force in Kosovo was both lawful and the right thing to have done.

We need to figure out how we can be flexible enough as a country to constantly improve and upgrade technology.

I have had two sons serve in Iraq.

Modernization is much more critical today as we see congestion, not only in the air, but on the roads.

I believe, successfully defeated the terrorists overseas to protect American families at home.

I share a concern of the Chairman when I heard what Mr. Wright said, and compared to Mr. Krakowski, that the working relationship might not be what we want.

I am very proud and grateful today.

If you'll serve 22 years, you can maybe retire at 50.

Well, that gets us to a point--we are spending money very quickly on some things that are very controversial, and there is a lot of pushback.

What I've been thinking about doing is in certain selected areas, critical need areas, if you'll stay to 22 years of service you can retire maybe at 59 years old, and just walk your way down to 55 years old, as an incentive to stay on.

Bad teeth are doing more damage to us than the enemy.

I think moving retirement benefits from 30 to 40 years, where you can continue to accrue it, is a good step forward.