The security begins at the target and emanates outward, not with the expanse of the ocean.
These are criminals and if we treat this criminal activity as being attributable to poverty, we're going to be ineffecti...
My time is up, but I'll be interested to hear as this goes on what the international community intends to do and what ou...
Incidentally, in terms of the numbers that Senator Inhofe was talking about, one of you mentioned the number that I've s...
From a larger, if I can say, international citizenship point of view, a safety point of view, it's not the right decisio...
We in the United States I believe need a clearly stated policy with respect to these sorts of attacks on our flag vessel...
It does have costs. We have to find a way to increase the responsibility of the private shipping business to self-protec...
I think this is part of its historic role that's gone back for 200 years. It's a part of who we are as a Nation.
the facts and analysis simply do not support the case for adding an alternate engine program.
I think we're sacrificing operational capability for acquisition efficiency.
I think we're looking further downstream into the future, at emerging threats.
My basic feeling is that this country, because of its global responsibilities, does need a credible capability to hold t...
These investments in systems like the F-22, in my view, are investments in deterrents.
I think you framed the questions very well.
It's been a very helpful hearing, from the subcommittee's point of view.
I do think there's a major part of it, that there was a budget ceiling that people had to live within.
To make an irrevocable decision which does not rest on any known analysis appears to me to be imprudent.
That's what, in our world, we tend to call straight talk.
