
Madam President, I ask unanimous consent that reading of the amendment be dispensed with. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered. The amendment is as follows: (Purpose: To reduce amounts authorized to be appropriated)…
On the public record
Every politician on the site, every statement on file. Search, filter, and read the public record.
18,700+·quotes on file

Madam President, I ask unanimous consent that reading of the amendment be dispensed with. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered. The amendment is as follows: (Purpose: To reduce amounts authorized to be appropriated)…

We are extremely concerned about the direction taken by the Commodity Trading Futures Commission (``CFTC'') in its proposed rules with respect to bona fide hedging.

We believe the proposed regulations are unnecessarily narrow, impose onerous reporting obligations on commercial market participants, and lack the flexibility necessary to ensure that the legitimate hedging activities of corporations who…

When we are sitting at $14 trillion worth of debt and we are drowning in debt...

Title V is a problem because we inappropriately match properties to the benefit of Title V...

The $1.2 billion does not come close to the cost of maintaining those 70,000.

We are making something very, very difficult, and every time we try to move anything on this...

Take the money. Separate real property from homelessness.

Mr. President, with all due respect, I plan to support the amendment that has been addressed by my good friend from Iowa. Having come from the small business world, I am fully aware of the cost of these things, and tomorrow I will be…

There has never been one documented case of groundwater contamination as a result of that.

the wisdom of the Senate is that not more than 30 members of a 100-member Senate will vote to impose that type of cap and trade and those restrictions that would damage our economy.

Steven Chu said, somehow we have got to figure out how to boost the price of gasoline to the levels of those in Europe.

the truth about Obama's regulatory agenda is inescapable: it's designed make the energy we use more expensive.

For every $1 that we spend for diesel emission reduction, we basically get a benefit, economic and health benefit of about $13.