As far as you know, does the EPA--did they change the requirements for Dallas and Houston based on this scientific data?
I wasn't in office, though, at the time. So that is easy for me to say.
I wonder if you would take that same approach to tax expenditures that aren't serving their purpose.
I just want to clarify. I didn't think it was.
Putting aside reform? ... I mean, that is the problem is that we have this attitude that if you start something in the m...
I think many of us believe that the decision to help rescue the financial industry was a bitter pill but a necessary one...
I don't believe that that is appropriate.
The heartbreaking unemployment hurting America's families stems from a philosophy that Wall Street banks should be allow...
I agree with you--first of all, I also agree with Mr. Edwards that we should get rid of some of those agriculture subsid...
I am assuming from your testimony you don't think that that is an inappropriate government interference in the marketpla...
They continue to refer to the auto rescue, not as an example of an important government intervention that helped million...
I do believe that there is a lot of agreement. But let me just start with what sort of got me going here.
Ninety-eight percent of the Republican Members of the Congress have pledged to oppose any increase of tax rates.
This is the most anti-environment House in the history of this country.
One especially clear embodiment of the misplaced priorities of House Republicans is their hostility to clean energy.
The priorities reflected in the House budget are wrong.
For eight years, President Bush pursued a failed ideology of trickle-down economics based on a theory that tax cuts for ...
If there is a government program that is not achieving its intended purpose, let's amend it or get rid of it.
