However, we are going to pursue whatever it takes to the Corps of Engineers to get this project done correctly.
I think Senator Vitter and our whole delegation share this, we want a comprehensive system that keeps people in this are...
So, do you all want to stand on your suggestion that we just move the 250,000 people?
As the Senator from this State, I want to say that I am not going to lead the retreat. I will not lead the retreat. We a...
I would just like to close by reading again into the record what the language clearly says about the $3 billion that we ...
What similarities do you see and what are the one of two things that you think we could really appreciate from the Dutch...
But under Option 1, which you want to move forward with, they would not be redesigned, they would not be rebuilt?
Will you and the Chief Architect of GSA work with my office to ensure that the agency complies with the Stafford Act and...
I strongly believe that one of the problems is that in the past there has not been enough common work and coordination a...
I guess one of the points I am trying to make is that the Corps will say, well, under Option 1 we are going to match at ...
But my point is, if under Option 1 you cannot allow the water to get past 6 feet, you are giving up a lot of safe storag...
So again, under Option 1, that would not change. Under Option 2, it would completely change for the better.
So, just to underscore this, where the canal walls breached have been replaced with a whole new design. Correct?
OK. So, under Option 1, the solution is to lower the water level allowed in the canal to a lower 'safe water level.' Is ...
So, wherever there is not a breach, which is 99 percent of the walls we are talking about, there is the same old faulty ...
Thank you very much, Madam Chair.
I believe this language covers Option 2 more clearly than it covers Option 1.
But they provide a heck of a lot more protection from flooding.
