I want the government to have as much information as possible, because I do not want the government to be spending publi...
Nobody is putting a gun to the head of these contractors and saying you must do business with the Federal Government.
The notion that there is not negative information about CGI Federal or the subsidiaries of BP in PPIRS is embarrassing.
There is no information about the proceedings; they just answered yes.
I wish we could have a discussion about whether or not we should change that rule to include information before April 20...
Shouldn't the contractors report their involvement in any litigation, or should we just limit it to those where they had...
I do not think we are ever going back and checking that they are reporting accurately, completely, or if they are report...
It just worries me that they overlook it and then there is nothing that happens. That is my biggest concern.
And so now we are integrating it, so this will be in fact a one-stop shop.
Shouldn't there be some kind of trigger when you have a company that is new?
Has there been any discussion about trying to include contracting at the State or local level?
CGI Federal should have had entries on October 1st in PPIRS. Major screw up.
It sounds like we are still stuck there 4 years later. Is that accurate?
it is just easier to let it slide
But I do not want you to think I do not recognize that there has been some progress.
It is hard for me to imagine that the vast majority of the past performance evaluations are even the slightest bit sensi...
I think it is troubling. There are lots of places that I think security warnings are appropriate, but I think we need to...
OK. Now I want to illustrate a basic difficulty with searching for a contractor's information.
