I think it is pretty clear that the administration has been slow in making those nominations.
It just makes perfect sense to me that these cases would be tried there.
After 9/11, our Nation fundamentally re-evaluated its approach to terrorism.
I think the simpler and more logical decision would be to reconsider fundamentally and try this case where it should be, I think, in militar...
We then began to establish a military commission framework consistent with history for the detention, interrogation, and trial of captured a...
We recognized that we are at war and that our normal criminal justice procedures were not designed for and not appropriate for the new threa...
I supported your nomination, but your actions have shaken my confidence in your leadership at the Department of Justice.
When you try a person in civilian court, you have to give the Miranda warning upon taking them into custody.
I think it is important that the executive branch strike the right balance between preserving the rule of law and releasing individuals who ...
The record of the Article III courts in the conviction of terrorists in this country is unparalleled, and that is absolute fact.
Isn't it true and isn't it appropriate that after they have been taken into military custody, if you chose to try them in civilian court, yo...
You had a commission, you co-chaired the commission to decide what to do, and you concluded that even those who had already been arrested an...
Why wouldn't that be the right way to start the case and have a policy for every FBI agent, every police officer, every TSA airport official...
This is really significant, the whole thing is.
Well, so I would just say that there is not exactly a clean slate and you decide each case based on the facts of that case.
I hope that you will review that, and I hope the New York case will be the beginning of a re-evaluation of that policy.
We need a policy, No. 1.
I think it is fair to say you would make some individual determinations on cases.
