I have looked at the--I read a book the other day and it talked about how we industrialized America without subsidies.
I guess I am just skeptical that I don't think there is a real hunger here for us to solve anything.
I want to know what subsidy is going to coal.
Why aren't we doing it?
the U.S. Senate has also not agreed to or been consulted on unilateral nuclear reductions.
the United States must have a strong deterrence that is effective in meeting its security needs and those of its allies.
the U.S. Senate did not consent to a goal of disarmament.
the administration may be on the verge of abandoning that approach, opting instead for a nuclear weapons policy focused ...
Whatever this bill comes out, I hope there are some ways to get down to the grassroots level how we can deal with this.
I still think what I have heard were a lot of larger firms, a lot more records; but smaller firms are--I am trying to un...
I can't again overemphasize the sense of urgency I feel and my commitment to doing everything possible to change what's ...
If the U.S. fails to enact CEDA and regain the lead in clean energy technology deployment, we will likely see U.S. innov...
It's not going to go because of the return on investment. Basically, if the market's not there and the price is so high,...
It seems one size fits all and when prices are $100 a barrel or $75 a ton of coal or $14 an mcf, the credits just keep m...
I think we're talking about putting fairness to the system, as it needed it, at certain prices.
It just seems to me that, with the dependency that we have on fossil--in West Virginia we do a little bit of everything.
So we've got to continue to give it tax-supported money to make them viable?
In a time when we're looking to be more--less dependent on foreign oil, it seems like that was an unwise move.
