The U.S. Senate can and should help in this regard, by approving S. 1956, the 'European Union Emissions Trading Scheme Prohibition Act.'
The imposition of this unilateral cap, tax, and trade scheme on U.S. citizens and U.S. companies is a clear violation of our nation's sovere...
Good intentions don't work.
Until ICAO reaches an agreement, the EU's program is reasonable, affordable, and it makes sense.
The stuff that goes up there goes to everybody's airspace. It doesn't stay in the United States.
Make no mistake. The ETS is not about the environment. It's about a new source of revenue for cash-strapped Europe.
I hope not. I'd be interested to hear, through you, from our friends in the airlines whether they would still want the ban if the Secretary ...
Secretary Clinton and Secretary LaHood have clearly and correctly stated that this application of the ETS is inconsistent with the legal reg...
U.S. aviation emissions have declined since 2000. They are down more than 12 percent through 2010.
I support the goals, but I have to oppose the action.
The United States has always led the world on aviation issues.
The United States Government takes a back seat to no one when it comes to reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the transportation sector.
the bill gives the Secretary of Transportation the authority to take the necessary steps to ensure America's aviation operators are not pena...
I believe that the airline industry both in the United States and globally needs to take steps to reduce its greenhouse emissions now.
We called on the EU to halt EU ETS as it pertains to international aviation and to find a global solution for aviation greenhouse gas emissi...
Nothing happening is not an option which I want to contemplate.
We don't have any regime. We have no effort to control carbon, except for the individual efforts of cities' mayors.
Doing nothing is not an option.
