
If ultimately one of your great defenses is that it costs more to do it another way, then the first question is, you can offset that by having the right to sell this very valuable information, so cost is a false facade, it is a canard…
On the public record
Every politician on the site, every statement on file. Search, filter, and read the public record.
111,600+·quotes on file

If ultimately one of your great defenses is that it costs more to do it another way, then the first question is, you can offset that by having the right to sell this very valuable information, so cost is a false facade, it is a canard…

Thank God it is not Sweden. I love it when it is Canada instead of Sweden.

I just want to follow up. Mr. Clay made two good points.

At the end of the day, can't we all agree that not every question has a compelling Federal interest that mandates it?

I would hope that this breach of professionalism of Peter Glick and the Pacific Institute is not just swept under the rug.

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Senate bill 1710 would designate the United States courthouse located at 222 West Seventh Avenue, Anchorage, Alaska, as the James M. Fitzgerald United States Courthouse. Just last…

Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the bill (S. 1710) to designate the United States courthouse located at 222 West 7th Avenue, Anchorage, Alaska, as the James M. Fitzgerald United States Courthouse. The Clerk read the title…

Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is on the motion offered by the gentleman from California (Mr. Denham) that the House suspend the rules and pass the bill, S. 1710. The question was…

Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from Alaska (Mr. Young). (Mr. YOUNG of Alaska asked and was given permission to revise and extend his remarks.)

Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members may have 5 legislative days in which to revise and extend their remarks and include extraneous material on S. 1710. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the…

We need to understand what impacts there will be to personnel and family programs as a result of a proposed budget request.

These are going to be very, very difficult decisions.

We are obviously drawing down our forces. We are preparing our families.

Where we really need help is in the licensing and ability of our soldiers to... use that in another state.

There is a growing public apprehension and alarm with potential negative impacts of hydraulic fracturing.

I think I was really just concerned with whether or not there are individuals looking at the physical standards.

We appreciate receiving your views on the fiscal year 2013 budget request for military personnel, and look forward to hearing how the proposed budget will impact our military personnel and their families.

Support for wounded warriors and their families, transition into civilian lives for those that are leaving the service, care and support for families that are staying, these demands are not going to go away.