We can change our minds. It's occurred to me that, yes, we initially put that out there to be 2 years, but maybe we migh...
I think we have to be more positive in our approach on this, and on looking at these potential conflicts of interest.
I'll have to correct some of the ways I've been saying things then because I've been led to believe maybe some of the im...
We provided $1.1 billion for comparative effectiveness in the Recovery Act.
Would you tell us what, if anything, is being done to expand the research portfolio for this lethal form of cancer?
Maybe this grant leads to a new compound that a pharmaceutical company wants to develop into a new drug and that means m...
I just want to see how we judge the success of the Recovery Act funding.
It seems to me that if you put most of the money in the RO1 grants and you do it for 2 years rather than 4 years, what h...
Should we put so much of that into just one disease rather than spreading it out more?
We have to be cognizant of this issue and do our best to answer those problems.
It's not just geared toward the American people, and so with all of that research we have to keep thinking about, what's...
It seems to me that concerning the program you talked about, the Grant Opportunity Program, the GO Grants, it is my info...
I know the statistics on cancer. I've fought as hard as anyone for more money for cancer research.
Do you have any idea about when we might be able to really get some body of evidence or something that we could rely on ...
I'm still wrestling with that. I still don't understand that.
So again, I'm back to square one. Is this a fair allotment of money?
I hope we don't end up subsidizing the shipping of American jobs to other countries.
We passed, over my objection, the TARP funding last fall, the $780 billion.
