But farmers and ranchers are a great strength of this economy. And I am confident that they will help lead the way to recovery.
I want to know if that makes sense.
I just think you're doing an outstanding job at NIH, all of you.
I personally, as a member of this subcommittee, support additional funding for NIH research, but in particular, today just for a few minutes...
We can change our minds. It's occurred to me that, yes, we initially put that out there to be 2 years, but maybe we might want to think abou...
I think we have to be more positive in our approach on this, and on looking at these potential conflicts of interest.
I'll have to correct some of the ways I've been saying things then because I've been led to believe maybe some of the immunities we have com...
We provided $1.1 billion for comparative effectiveness in the Recovery Act.
Would you tell us what, if anything, is being done to expand the research portfolio for this lethal form of cancer?
Maybe this grant leads to a new compound that a pharmaceutical company wants to develop into a new drug and that means more money in our eco...
I just want to see how we judge the success of the Recovery Act funding.
It seems to me that if you put most of the money in the RO1 grants and you do it for 2 years rather than 4 years, what happens after 2 years...
Should we put so much of that into just one disease rather than spreading it out more?
I am familiar with 1001, yes.
I appreciate your testimony and I think it reflects the long service to this country and the significant depth of knowledge that has been bu...
I believe the prosecutor is looking at this. Department of Justice attorneys would look at 1001, absolutely, as a possible statute to be app...
Somebody has to make those determinations.
Thank you very much, Madam Secretary. Again, I really appreciate the focus you've made getting back in the game on OSHA and worker protectio...
