To enhance the economic and national security of America.
That law was not passed, despite having what could have been a path to passage there with majorities of both Houses and ...
But again, those are costs. And those do get allocated into rates; correct?
I would like to point out before we go into questions that we did invite the EPA administrator, Gina McCarthy, to appear...
What is the benefit of those reductions in pollution versus what is the cost to society?
The Federal Government is ramping up its jurisdiction over the States.
But this EPA regulation is actually weaker than the one that was in effect up until 2001.
But it would have been nice to have them here, and we could have bounced some of these ideas off them.
One study on the draft rule projected the job loss to our State at 21,000 jobs for 2030 with a $1.82 billion drop in dis...
But do you understand businesses and organizations are concerned that sometimes the Federal Government, even though they...
this really is an attempt for a dramatic increase in jurisdiction by the Federal Government over waters within States.
I had written an oversight letter to Mr. Howard Shelanski, the administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory...
We love our environment, and we want to keep it clean.
And it pretty well renders Congress pretty much useless.
We have a climate change problem in this world. We need to deal with it.
Maybe, that is a pretty good argument.
In the first two years of Obama Administration where they had a 60-vote filibuster-proof majority in the Senate.
$37,000 per day could be the potential fines if you do not obtain the necessary permit.
