What is the benefit of those reductions in pollution versus what is the cost to society?
the Clean Power Plan is the centerpiece of the Obama Administration's intended environmental legacy, but the repercussio...
I would like to point out before we go into questions that we did invite the EPA administrator, Gina McCarthy, to appear...
I would find it hard to believe... that regulators and EPA could better manage our State's pristine water resources than...
Those forests that are managed where we actually allow timber harvesting are far healthier.
You really do not need the Federal Government butting in and creating high levels of uncertainty.
good neighbor authority is really moving more toward the type of approval process, sort of the one-stop approval process
If the Federal Government gets involved and claims jurisdiction over these things, you are concerned...
We have a climate change problem in this world. We need to deal with it.
And it pretty well renders Congress pretty much useless.
We love our environment, and we want to keep it clean.
To enhance the economic and national security of America.
This is going to affect our economy in some way, shape, or form.
That law was not passed, despite having what could have been a path to passage there with majorities of both Houses and ...
One study on the draft rule projected the job loss to our State at 21,000 jobs for 2030 with a $1.82 billion drop in dis...
But it would have been nice to have them here, and we could have bounced some of these ideas off them.
But again, those are costs. And those do get allocated into rates; correct?
But this EPA regulation is actually weaker than the one that was in effect up until 2001.
