I think that is part of it, yes. Yes, I do.
That is correct. In fact, they said, 'could select organizations for examinations in an unfair manner.'
He has the duty and obligation, a legal obligation, under a subpoena to comply with that subpoena.
It's hard to understand nor can I definitively identify the motive. But I also think there is an underlying belief in th...
It is.
That's my understanding.
Did they provide false and misleading testimony to Congress? Yes and on more than one occasion.
I think what we would find is that, in fact, we were lied to in Congress, we were misled in Congress, that there was gro...
The first question you have to ask is did they destroy documents that were under subpoena. I think the answer is clearly...
What Congress really wants is access to the documents and the witnesses, because that is the lifeblood of any investigat...
Potentially one of the things that I'm concerned about is the FBI never interviewed Mr. Koskinen.
The Administration knows it can delay and we can't let them get away with it.
Did they or did they not destroy the evidence? They did.
I believe the Constitution is an inspired document and our Founders put this mechanism in place specifically on civil of...
We have a very different experience with him. We can have our disagreements with him, but that doesn't mean that there's...
For the most part, he's been very cooperative with us.
Settlements are basically preferable to litigation, and that it usually helps the taxpayer because it takes away burdens...
Damn it, do it, we cannot move forward with these bills until that has taken place, do it.
