No, sir. In that case we were talking about, and deciding, an issue of whether the agency had followed its own procedure...
I've been and am very cautious about expressing personal views since I've been a judge.
I share your view of the importance of property rights under the Constitution.
My own judgment is that it would seem odd, indeed, if any Justice would sit in review of a decision that they authored.
I would tell them to look at my decisions for 17 years and note that in every one of them, I have done what I say that I...
I regret that I have offended some people. I believe that my life demonstrates that that was not my intent to leave the ...
Our society would be straitjacketed were it not--were not the courts, with the able assistance of the lawyers, constantl...
No, sir. Absolutely not.
Our system of election financing permits extensive private, including corporate financing of candidate's campaigns, rais...
The issue was whether or not employees who were a member of a disparately impacted group had a right under existing prec...
Work at explaining to the--to the public what the process is.
intrusions by a judge upon the functions of other branches of government should only be done as a last resort and limite...
I will not use foreign law to interpret the Constitution or American statutes.
I do not believe that judges should use their personal feelings, beliefs, or value systems or make their--to influence t...
No, that's not the role of the courts. The role of the courts is to interpret the law as Congress writes it.
What choices do you think about in terms of what Congress will do, what politicians will do.
It must be applied, as is all the court's existing precedents that have not been rejected by the court.
The intent of the founders were set forth in the Constitution.
