Political Quotes

On the recordFebruary 17, 2011
Mr. Speaker, I will be brief today. I will just make several points but not extensively because this is the fifth debate we've had on this subject in 10 days and I think everything has been said. First of all, I have pledged in the past and I will pledge again today on this House floor that there will be hearings on a reauthorization of the expiring provisions of the Patriot Act, as well as an oversight hearing on the Patriot Act as a whole. The three provisions that are up for reauthorization are important provisions to keep America safe, and I want to dispel some of the misinformation that has again been placed in the Record on the floor of the House today. First of all, section 215, which is the business records provision, has more strict standards for the issuance of a FISA warrant than the issuance of a Grand Jury subpoena in a criminal record. And only business records can be obtained. That means that it is not subject to the Fourth Amendment because it's not a search and seizure under the Fourth Amendment. The reauthorization in 2005, which I authored, provided procedures for recipients of section 215 warrants to seek judicial review of those orders compelling the production of business records. So people can have their day in court to have the warrant quashed. With respect to roving wiretaps, they're nothing new. We have had roving wiretaps for decades over criminal investigations such as racketeering and drug pushing.…
Said by
Jim Sensenbrenner
Republican · Wisconsin

Share & report

More from Jim Sensenbrenner

Jul 22, 2020

Madam Speaker, I rise today in opposition to the No BAN Act. This bill is being framed as a ``religious freedom'' initiative. I have fought for religious freedom throughout my career. I know what religious freedom means. This bill is not…

Congressional Record · 2020-07-22
Sep 29, 2020

I did not, and there is no system that I know of that provides artists with compensation when their work is used.

congress.gov
Dec 10, 2019

And that is not what the law said, and it is not what the law should be.

congress.gov
Mar 11, 2020

Madam Speaker, I am no stranger to this debate. In the aftermath of 9/11, I stood on this floor to advance the USA PATRIOT Act. I still believe, as I did at the time, in its necessity to protect our country from terrorist attacks. In 2015…

Congressional Record · 2020-03-11

Other voices in this conversation