Madam Speaker, listening to the arguments that have been advanced by the proponents of the bill, all I can say is what you hear is not what you are going to get if this bill is enacted into law. There is a reason this antitrust exemption has survived now for 65 years, which is that it actually has encouraged competition because it allows smaller insurers to use the actuarial data that larger insurers are able to amass. If the smaller insurers can't get this actuarial data, which is what will happen if this bill is enacted into law, then they will either be gobbled up by the larger insurers, which get the data in-house, or they will go out of business. As a result, there will be less competition rather than more. So what you hear today about competition is not what you are going to get if this exemption is repealed. Now, repealing the limited exemption that health insurance carriers have under the McCarran-Ferguson Act is, at best, going to change little and, at worst, is going to be counterproductive. As the CBO concluded in October, repealing the exemption would have little or no effect on insurance premiums because State laws already bar the activities that would be prohibited under Federal law should the bill be enacted. Instead, additional regulatory burdens on insurers will likely be passed on to the policyholders in the form of higher premiums. This, my friends, is the majority's higher health insurance premium bill in the name of competition. It's not going to happen.…
Share & report
More from Jim Sensenbrenner
Madam Speaker, I appeal that ruling of the Chair as well, which I believe is appealable. The SPEAKER pro tempore. That ruling is not subject to appeal. The question is on the passage of the joint resolution. The question was taken; and the…
But obstruction of Congress, when there is no referee, there is no adjudication, there is nothing but a majority that says, 'You give us what we want until we find a crime, or we are going to throw you out of office,' that is so…
Madam Speaker, I rise in opposition to impeaching the President. The Constitution says that any civil officer, including the President, may be impeached for treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors. Unlike the Nixon and…
Now, let me say that everybody on both ends of the telephone call between President Trump and President Zelensky has said very clearly there was no quid pro quo offered.





