On the recordJuly 8, 2015
In my view, the Supreme Court in the Kelo case wisely refused to embrace novel interpretations of the public use requirement of the Takings Clause.
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Sensenbrenner supports the Kelo decision as a model of legal restraint.
Share & report
More from F. Sensenbrenner
Dec 10, 2019
The Constitution says that the President and other civil officials can be impeached for treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.
Dec 10, 2019
Now, let me say that everybody on both ends of the telephone call between President Trump and President Zelensky has said very clearly there was no quid pro quo offered.
Dec 8, 2019
You have made Joe McCarthy look like a piker with what you've done with the electronic surveillance involved.
Dec 10, 2019
if you, on the other side of the aisle, believe that Joe Biden is a man who tells the truth, you ought to support this amendment
Other voices in this conversation
