Isn't it ironic that a bill about self-determination has got to have the heavy hand of the United States Congress dictating to the people of Puerto Rico about this vote. I find that terribly ironic. There is no need for the United States Congress to pass this bill. No need. Four times, in 1952, in 1967, in 1993 and in 1998, the people of Puerto Rico were able to vote on this. They didn't need the approval of the United States Congress to do it; they don't need it today. But it is a manipulation of the process to try to get a desired outcome. If you want to vote on statehood, take a straight vote. Do the people of Puerto Rico, yes or no, do the people of Puerto Rico want statehood? Simple, straightforward, to the point, and let's understand if that is truly what they want. I am a conservative person. I do not believe that I should be trying to manipulate what is happening in Puerto Rico and what they want. Finally, I will end with this. Please, as you consider this bill, understand that you are empowering people to vote in this election that have no business voting in this election.
Jason Chaffetz: “Isn't it ironic that a bill about self-determination has got to have the heavy hand of the United States Congress…”
Editor's note · Context
Chaffetz discusses the implications of a bill regarding Puerto Rico's self-determination and voting rights.
Share
More from Jason Chaffetz
Congress has a right to have this material it, and it is unbelievable to me that you think that we shouldn't have a copy of it.
I think this is one area where clearly the money that we are putting in has the potential to really do a huge amount of good for people's lives.
Unlike most states in our Union, nearly 70 percent of the state of Utah is owned by the Federal and state government.
This legislation would require Federal law enforcement agencies to fully report to Congress on their payments to confidential informants as well as the amounts they have received through their work or cooperation with informants.





