I will just say, I think that is right. I appreciate the President reevaluating the position taken by his Attorney General. I think it was based on a number of errors in analysis of the nature of the conflict we are in and the status of law, frankly, in America today. I have written about that in the Politico publication. I will make a point or two about the five errors, mistakes, sometimes even falsehoods, it seems to me, that have been put forth to justify trying military combatants--unlawful combatants, really--in civilian courts and why this is not a good idea and some of the thought processes we should go through.
Pete Sessions: “I will just say, I think that is right. I appreciate the President reevaluating the position taken by his Attorney…”
Editor's note · Context
Sessions discusses the potential use of military tribunals for 9/11 suspects and critiques the Attorney General's previous stance.
Share
More from Pete Sessions
I feel like a heist has taken place, and nobody knows who that masked man was that rode off into the sunset.
I appreciate the opportunity to speak on the floor about a very important topic but really to honor two people, Jackie and David Siegel of central Florida. Jackie and David Siegel, as proud Americans, have stepped up to form what is known…
I believe the first nine months with the self-certification went unchecked, and that had a lot to do with a lot of the fraud.
It seems like we have gotten off into equity and diversity and all these other matters. I would like to, if I can, go a little bit higher and go to the challenges of politically driven agendas.





