I notice today that a single sitting Federal judge in California has just wiped out proposition 8 that was passed by a majority of the people in California. I guess there were millions voting on that, which simply said a marriage should be defined as being between a man and a woman. This judge struck down proposition 8 and, obviously, at some point, this will get to the Supreme Court of the United States, as the Senator well knows. It will go first to the Ninth Circuit, on which the Senator clerked, and then it will go to the Supreme Court probably. We will have the nominee who is before us today who has already demonstrated at Harvard that her views about don't ask, don't tell and similar social and marriage issues involve such strong feelings on her part that she has not been able to follow the law. I am worried about that. I think the American people are worried about that, and I think they have a right to be. Let me talk a little bit about today's decision by a Federal judge in California that was replete, in my view, with results-oriented liberal judicial activism.
Pete Sessions: “I notice today that a single sitting Federal judge in California has just wiped out proposition 8 that was passed by a…”
Editor's note · Context
The speaker addresses concerns over a federal judge's ruling on Proposition 8 and its implications for a Supreme Court nomination.
Share
More from Pete Sessions
It is also President Biden who finds himself at the vise grip of employees who decide that they do not like his policies related to Gaza.
I thank the gentleman, Brother Weber, for you bringing tonight this conversation that Members of Congress on a bipartisan basis can have about the gentleman from Texas, Michael Burgess. I am one of a few Members that remember well when he…
Today, I rise to honor Judge Julie Kocurek, who is the 390th State District judge in Austin, Texas. In 2015, the judge survived an assassination attempt by a criminal defendant seeking revenge for a decision she made in his case. Judge…





