Mr. Speaker, there's no question this Congress for many years has had a problem with spending. The Democratic Congress developed a bigger and bigger appetite for spending for 40 years, as it held the majority for years and years. Then Republicans took the House in 1995, and they forced a balanced budget on President Clinton. They had friction between the President and the Congress, and that allowed this country to have a balanced budget. Who would have ever thought--I certainly wouldn't. I know I have got some Democratic friends who would have thought it, but I wouldn't--but when we got a Republican President and we had Republican majorities in the House and Senate, we began to spend again. There wasn't the friction there to hold spending down, and Republicans, I would submit, lost their way and began spending too much money. My first year in Congress, in 2005 and 2006, we shouldn't have spent the money we did. And I can recall being here on the floor and having Democratic friends beating us up, rightfully so, because in 2006 we spent $160 billion more than we had coming in. We didn't have to do that. We shouldn't have done that.…
Share & report
More from Louie Gohmert
When you are telling individuals that they can enter this country illegally and there will be no consequences for their actions, that is pretty much inviting people to come here and break the law, and the cartels are aware of that.
Mr. Speaker, on that I demand the yeas and nays. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to section 3(s) of House Resolution 8, the yeas and nays are ordered. Pursuant to clause 8 of rule XX, further proceedings on this question are postponed…
Mr. Speaker, this is truly an interesting time, which takes me back to the alleged Chinese curse that may you live in interesting times. Well, we are living in interesting times. Growing up hearing the term ``pot calling the kettle…
We like to go down and just see for ourselves--no dog and pony tour--but see for ourselves what's happening.





