Madam Chair, the gentleman's amendment strikes the first-inventor-to-file provisions from the bill. I strongly oppose the amendment. The move to a first-inventor-to-file system creates a more efficient and reliable patent system that benefits all inventors, including independent inventors. This provision provides a more transparent and certain grace period, a key feature of U.S. law, and a more definite filing date that enables inventors to promote, fund, and market their technology while making them less vulnerable to costly patent challenges that disadvantage independent inventors. The first-inventor-to-file system is absolutely consistent with the Constitution's requirement that patents be awarded to the inventor. Former Attorney General Michael Mukasey has stated that the ``provision is constitutional and helps assure that the patent laws of this country accomplish the goal set forth in the Constitution: `to promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts.' '' Under first-inventor-to-file, patent rights are reserved to someone who independently conceived of an invention before it was in the public domain. And under the Constitution, that is what is required to be considered an ``inventor.'' {time} 1530 In fact, early American patent law, that of our Founders' generation, did not concern itself with who was the first to invent. The U.S. operated under a first-inventor-to-register system for nearly half a century, starting in 1790.…
Share & report
More from Lamar Smith
Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Weber), who is the chairman of the Energy Subcommittee of the Science Committee.
Mr. Speaker, I thank Mr. Hultgren for yielding me time on his bill, H.R. 5907, the National Innovation Modernization by Laboratory Empowerment Act, or NIMBLE Act. This legislation authorizes the Secretary of Energy to provide signature…
Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members may have 5 legislative days in which to revise and extend their remarks and to include extraneous materials on H.R. 589, the bill now under consideration. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is…
Mr. Speaker, I have no other requests for time either, and I yield back the balance of my time. The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. Woodall). The question is on the motion offered by the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Smith) that the House suspend the…





