I would like to support this legislation, but I cannot. As Mr. Camp has pointed out, this has always been a bipartisan process. When Republicans were in the majority, we regularly prepared this legislation in a bipartisan, transparent manner. It was bipartisan because Democrats and Republicans worked together to review every provision and to ensure there was no opposition to any provision and that it protected American companies. It was transparent because every provision was reviewed by the U.S. International Trade Commission, and the ITC's report was posted online for all of America to review. Every provision was subject to public notice and comment. I am happy to say, and I compliment our Democrat majority for continuing these transparent policies in this legislation, but as lead Republican originally on this bill, however, I will vote against this legislation because it violates the letter and the spirit of the Republican moratorium on earmark requests. Congress has to get a handle on earmarks. There is no question about it.
Kevin Brady: “I would like to support this legislation, but I cannot. As Mr. Camp has pointed out, this has always been a bipartisan…”
Editor's note · Context
The speaker addresses concerns about bipartisan processes and earmark requests in proposed legislation.
Share
More from Kevin Brady
I include in the Record a 2017 House report where the chairman said: ``Committee Democrats remain steadfast in our pursuit to have [President Trump's] individual tax returns disclosed to the public,'' which can be found at…
I include in the Record the Joint Committee on Taxation analysis that shows that families earning $75,000 or $100,000 are four times more likely to have a tax hike under this bill than a tax cut. Nonpartisan Tax Scorekeeper: Average…
I include in the Record the following Joint Committee on Taxation analysis that shows that American manufacturers are hardest hit by the Democrats' made in America tax--$200 billion-- and they will pay over half of that tax. Congress of…





