I think we are playing with fire when we talk about amending the Senate rules. I have been here for 8 years, which actually sounds like a long time, but in the life of the Senate is not very long at all in an institution that has existed for more than 200 years. I have been here when our side was in the majority. As a matter of fact, we had the White House, we had both Houses of Congress. And I have been here when we have had President Obama in the White House and Democrats controlling both Houses of Congress. I can tell you, unequivocally, it is a whole lot more fun to be here when you are in the majority. But there are certain temptations that the majority has which I think are exacerbated when, for example, during most of the last 2 years, one party or the other has the ability in the Senate to basically pass legislation by essentially a party-line vote;...there is a huge temptation in both parties--not just the Democrats; Republicans, I am sure, would be tempted as well-- to try to go it alone.
John Cornyn: “I think we are playing with fire when we talk about amending the Senate rules. I have been here for 8 years, which…”
Editor's note · Context
Cornyn discusses the risks of amending Senate rules and the temptations of majority power.
Share
More from John Cornyn
I’m proud to join Senator Padilla in introducing the Desalination Reauthorization Act, which would authorize desalination grant programs for the next year to help construct more ocean and brackish-water desalination facilities to ensure…
I think I am prepared to vote no, but I do think I owe it to my constituents and to Mr. Blanche to try to negotiate in good faith.
Well, there’s nothing we could do to rein in the president when he said he likes the fund and he wishes it still exists.
If it would make a difference in the outcome, I'm fine with that, but it won't make a difference, which I don't believe it will, that it's an act of futility," Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, told Fox News Digital.





