Madam Chair, I make the point of order that the amendment violates clause 10 of rule XXI known as the cut-go rule. I have been advised by the chair of the Committee on the Budget that the amendment would cause a net increase in mandatory spending relative to the bill in the period specified in the rule. Accordingly, the point of order lies, and I ask for a ruling from the chair. The Acting CHAIR. Does any other Member wish to be heard on the point of order?
Share & report
More from Jeb Hensarling
Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from Wisconsin (Mr. Duffy), the chairman of our Subcommittee on Housing and Insurance and the author of the real flood reform bill.
Mr. Speaker, I yield myself the balance of my time. Mr. Speaker, deja vu all over again. This House has been here many times before. In fact, we have had 41 reauthorizations of this program, 38 with no reforms. So, a vote for S. 1182 is a…
Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentlewoman from Missouri (Mrs. Wagner), the chairwoman of the Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee of the Financial Services Committee.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from Michigan (Mr. Huizenga), who is the chairman of our Capital Markets, Securities, and Investments Subcommittee.
Other voices in this conversation
