On the recordJune 25, 2020
Madam Speaker, I rise today in opposition to this bill, which is unfortunate because it doesn't have to be this way. There is actually a lot of agreement on much of this bill. Honestly, I was pleasantly surprised when I read it, and if we voted on this section by section, I believe there are some areas where there would be an overwhelming bipartisan majority for some necessary and crucial reforms. There are other parts where, if we just worked together and made some changes, we would likely get to yes on a lot of these. But as it stands now, it doesn't directly defund the police, but it certainly will result in less policing. Needless to say, that hurts the communities we are trying to help the most. There isn't a community meeting out there that is asking for less police. Minority neighborhoods or high crime neighborhoods want more police. Now, they want better policing, but they want more of it. In the Senate, Democrats wouldn't even debate Senator Scott's bill. Here in the House, Democrats won't let Republicans offer a single amendment. What reason could the majority possibly have for refusing to work with us? When Americans are demanding that we work together toward common goals, why won't Democrats do so? This is sad, cynical politics. The Speaker of the House would rather call Republicans murderers than work with us on solutions. But it was never really about police reform. The majority's eyes and actions are fixed on November, not police reform. It is not too late.…





