Mr. Speaker, I rise in opposition to Chairman Upton's dirty air act. In 2007, the Supreme Court issued the Massachusetts v. EPA decision, directing the EPA to examine greenhouse gas emissions and their impact on the public health. EPA conducted a highly credible, peer-reviewed scientific analysis under the Bush EPA and the Obama EPA, both concluding that greenhouse gases harm our health. This was not a political analysis; it was a scientific analysis. But that has not stopped the chairman from trying to legislatively undermine scientific fact. According to the EPA, President Nixon's Clean Air Act will prevent 230,000 premature deaths and result in $2 trillion in economic benefits in 2020. But, Chairman Upton has decided, with much help from corporate polluters' lobbyists, that the fiscal and physical well-being of the American people are less important than Big Oil's importance and Big Oil's billion dollar bottom line next quarter. The bottom line for America is that undermining EPA science will cost trillions. ____________________
On the recordMarch 10, 2011
Share & report
More from Steve Cohen
Feb 25, 2025
Madam Speaker, this budget is about the millionaires, the trillionaires, the people earning over $400,000 a year, and giving them a $4 trillion tax cut over the next 10 years. It is not about working people. It is about hurting working…
Nov 13, 2024
Madam Speaker, I rise today to support the millions of Americans who live with disabilities and who want to stay in their homes. That seems like a pretty simple idea and something that, unfortunately, millions and millions of people are…
Jul 10, 2024
Donald Trump doesn't know anything, except he respects power, and he respects authoritarianism.
Sep 23, 2024
We are here to discuss Boeing, not Boeing's problem with getting capsules up to and carrying back astronauts from the space station.





