Jack Reed actually said...

So your conclusion would be that it really saves taxpayers' monies and efficient use of taxpayer' dollars.

It also might trigger some of the tax incentives that are built in now for home energy efficiencies, which would be sort of a double benefit...

I am told the cost of, well, this year's funding is $4 million, which seems to be a reasonable investment in such efficiency.

I find that somewhat disturbing. It seems to be entirely disruptive of not only the local housing market but the real estate market.