I thank the gentleman from Arizona. Mr. Speaker, we have been entreated to claims of collusion with our government, people high in our government with Russia for over a year now; since the last election happening this very day a year ago, we have been entreated to this. So I thought I would bring some sense to this confusion about what we know as the Uranium One deal. Even I didn't know a whole lot about it, so I did a little research to understand the timeline and what exactly happened here. I want to talk to you about that this evening. On June 8 of 2010, the Russian State Atomic Energy Corporation, also known as Rosatom--the Russian state, not some private organization. It belongs to Vladimir Putin. Make no mistake about it--announced plans to purchase a 51.4 percent stake in the Canadian company Uranium One. Now, why do we care? Well, we care because this announcement had significant strategic implications for the United States since Uranium One's international assets included 20 percent of the United States' uranium reserves. Now, due to uranium status as a strategic commodity, the $1.3 billion deal was subject to the approval of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, known as CFIUS; CFIUS, the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States. And they care because uranium is important. Do you know why? We make nuclear bombs out of it--that is why it is important--and so do other countries.…
On the recordNovember 7, 2017
Share
More from Scott Perry
Jan 23, 2025
I thank my good friend, the chairman of the committee, for his hard work to try to save one of our country's greatest assets that we see burning to the ground on an annual basis. We are always shocked, like we are surprised that it…
May 7, 2025
Evidently, this is what gutting Medicaid looks like. You see it goes up 25 percent over 10 years. This only happens in Washington, D.C. Mr. Speaker, the difference between the last administration and the current one is the last…
May 13, 2026
we support our farmers, but we also support our consumers. I appreciate my friends on both sides of the aisle for this position, but these two positions of being for farmers and being for consumers are not mutually exclusive. They are…





